Carlo Ginzburg. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Translated by John and Anne C. Tedeschi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. The Cheese and the Worms: the Cosmos of a 16th-Century Miller by Carlo Ginzburg, translated by John Tedeschi and Anne Tedeschi. The Cheese and the Worms has ratings and reviews. Jan-Maat Carlo Ginzburg uses the trial records of Domenico Scandella, a miller also known as.
|Published (Last):||17 March 2012|
|PDF File Size:||15.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ok, I’m leaving the rating at 3,5 stars. Again, in Menocchio we have a unique case of a literate peasant. After a few years he was released from prison, but he couldn’t stop talking, and ultimately the cardinal and pope put their red slippers down and insisted he be burned at the stake, pronto.
The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller
Ginzburg’s concise study was a fine read for a number of reasons. He was reappointed administrator and bought a new mill with his son. Sep anc, Stefan rated it it was amazing.
Carlo Ginzburg synthesizes the transcripts seamlessly with the wealth of historical context while acknowledging the lost or concealed truth about peasant culture of this era. Menocchio tell his views on heaven. God is nothing else than a little breath Though such a simple explanation that would provide a neat sense of closure on the subject is tempting to adopt, one can’t help but notice the empirical make-up of his metaphors. There are certainly pros and cons to a microhistory like this, but in any case it’s a great opportunity to get little glimpses of a non-noble or at least mostly non-noble perspective.
I believe that the [Holy Spirit] is in everybody Menocchio had a “tendency to reduce religion to morality”, using this as justification for his blasphemy during his trial because he believed that the only sin was to harm one’s neighbor and that to blaspheme caused no harm to anyone but the blasphemer.
The Cheese and the Worms. Ginzberg uses his story to attempt to reveal what ideas were floating around in the general peasant population concerning the reformation and Catholic and protestant doctrine.
What comes out of this is an interesting story about a crazy miller who didn’t know when to shut up, so I recommend it for that. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Few of us have the courage or quixotic folly to stare up at an inquisitor asking us to explain ourselves and respond: Professor Ginzburg has found another. Omg spoiler alert, I know.
The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller – Carlo Ginzburg – Google Books
Historian whose fields of interest range from the Italian Renaissance to early modern European History, with contributions in art history, literary studies, popular cultural beliefs, and the theory of historiography. The transcript of Menocchio’s agonies reads: So Menocchio was not tortured again, so far as we know, until he died in the fire.
Ginzburg identifies rationalism, scepticism, materialism, egalitarian utopianism and religious naturalism as permanent characteristics of this culture. Really one carko the best books I’ve read in grad school so far, or at least the one I’ve had the most enthusiastic response to.
Especially since this book is continually praised as an example of how you can tell an important tale without more than a close analysis of a single person’s life thus triumphs the qualitative researcher! Poi, grazie ad una minuziosa ricerca negli archivi, presenta la storia del Menocchio, al tempo Domenico Scandella.
Exhaustive analysis of Menocchio’s library reveals qnd highly creative and individual reading of the few texts at his disposal, raising the question to what extent they can be understood as “sources transmitting” ideas in any straightforward way. Furthermore, making 62 chapters out of pages seems to be little more than the classic and transparent undergraduate technique to fill space.
Imponderabilia: The Cheese and the Worms: Social History with Interdisciplinary Methodology
Oct 13, Sarah rated it liked it Shelves: Jan 06, Jen rated it liked it. But Anabaptists probably inherited this belief from the Hussites, who took it from English Lollards. Professor Ginzburg compares Montaigne, a contemporary operating at a very different intellectual level, who drew sceptical conclusions from reading descriptions of the natives of America. JHU Press- History – pages. Ginzburg in his wanderings through the labyrinthine mind of the miller of the Friuli will take leave of this strange and quirky old man with genuine regret.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
The Cheese and the Worms
Popular religion and the Counter-Reformation. The human scream cuts readily through such objections. Despite his anomalous approach to religion his village finds him an amiable personality, failing to report him to the Holy Office for well over thirty years. Jul 25, Karen rated it really liked it.
That last piece of peasant shrewdness was enough: More precisely, Ginzburg claims that by examining the way Menocchio, a man of the oral culture, interprets or in some cases willfully misreads the books he encounters representatives of the print culturewe can thereby discern certain qualities of the oral culture; or may do so, at least, to the degree that the oral culture is extricable from that of print, and to the degree that separate spheres of culture may be defined along certain media.
That said, as the first in its field, and as a highly intriguing study about a most interesting man, the work merits reading and re-reading — once for content and a second for technique.